Caring for Evidence
- Author(s)
- Kay Franziska Felder, Ulrike Felt, Michael Penkler
- Abstract
In recent years, there has been a substantial increase in bariatric surgery rates. This form of obesity treatment is often subjected to the critique that it turns patients into passive objects of medical intervention. Similarly, efforts to 'rationalize' medicine, as in evidence-based medicine, are sometimes denounced for imposing a 'one-size-fits-all' approach that neglects patient diversity. We argue that these critiques fail to do justice to the complexities of actual care situations. In our ethnographic study of a project for bariatric pre- and aftercare, we show how research protocols not only close down but also open up spaces for patient-centered care. Despite professional cautions, experiences of stigma and broader imaginations of biomedical care often lead patients to embrace surgery as a treatment conceptualized as a technological fix. We argue that investigations of how research and clinical practice intertwine need to be both empirically grounded and sensitive to wider societal contexts.
- Organisation(s)
- Department of Science and Technology Studies
- Journal
- Medical Anthropology
- Pages
- 404-418
- ISSN
- 0145-9740
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2015.1101100
- Publication date
- 2016
- Peer reviewed
- Yes
- Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- Social studies of science
- Portal url
- https://ucris.univie.ac.at/portal/en/publications/caring-for-evidence(748688b0-f42b-4604-bc8c-1d91dc7c9718).html