Jüngste Publikationen
Zeige Ergebnisse 81 - 100 von 566
Avkiran AS, Pham BC, Holmer C, Schikowitz A, Dessewffy E, Mora-Gámez F et al. Pandemic Research: Reflecting an on auto-ethnography of mundane academic practice in pandemic times. in DIY Methods: A Mostly Screen-Free, Zine-Full, Remote- Participation Conference on Experimental Methods for Research and Research Exchange. The Low-Carbon Research Methods Group. 2022. S. 243-253
Mayer K, Schürz S, Kieslinger B, Schaefer T. Editorial: Participatory Evaluation and Impact Assessment in Citizen Science. Plattform Forschungs- und Technologieevaluierung . 2022 Sep;(54):5-9. doi: 10.22163/fteval.2022.566
Kieslinger B, Schürz S, Mayer K, Schaefer T. Participatory evaluation practices in citizen social science: Insights from three case studies. Plattform Forschungs- und Technologieevaluierung . 2022 Sep;53:10-19. doi: 10.22163/fteval.2022.567
Michael C, Klimburg-Witjes N. Troubled Orbits and Earthly Concerns: Space Debris as a Boundary Infrastructure. Science, Technology & Human Values. 2022 Sep;47(5):960-985. Epub 2021 Jun. doi: 10.1177/01622439211023554
Lehner L. Vulnerability and One Health assessment approaches for infectious threats from a social science perspective: a systematic scoping review. The Lancet. Planetary Health. 2022 Aug;6(8):e682-e693. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00097-3
Falkenberg RI, Fochler M, Sigl L, Bürstmayr H, Eichorst S, Michel S et al. The breakthrough paradox: How focusing on one form of innovation jeopardizes the advancement of science. EMBO Reports. 2022 Jul 5;23(7):e54772. doi: 10.15252/embr.202254772
Felt U. Transitions, Expansions, Engagements: Science, Technology, & Human Values between 2002 and 2007. Science, Technology & Human Values. 2022 Jul;47(4):650-655. Epub 2022 Jun 5. doi: 10.1177/01622439221102987
Falkenberg RI, Fochler M, Sigl L. Collaboratively exploring notions of innovativeness in research practices. A short tale of interdisciplinary publishing. 2022.
Wald D, (ed.), Carvalho A, (ed.), Felt U, (ed.). Science in a Time of Crisis: Communication, Engagement and the Lived Experience of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Communication, 2022. doi: 10.3389/978-2-88976-306-1
Davies S. STS and science communication: Reflecting on a relationship. Public Understanding of Science. 2022 Mai;31(3):305-313. doi: 10.1177/09636625221075953
Metzler I, Åm H. How the governance of and through digital contact tracing technologies shapes geographies of power. Policy & Politics. 2022 Apr;50(2):181-198. Epub 2022 Feb 15. doi: 10.1332/030557321X16420096592965
Felt U, Frantz F. RESPONSE_ABILITY A Card‑Based Engagement Method to Support Researchers’ Ability to Respond to Integrity Issues. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2022 Apr;28(2):14. Epub 2022 Jan. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00365-6
Davies S. Science Communication at a Time of Crisis: Emergency, Democracy, and Persuasion. Sustainability. 2022 Apr;14(9):5103. doi: 10.3390/su14095103
Dessewffy E, Pham BC. Reflecting on care in research: Using collaborative autoethnography to find our place as PhD students at the STS department University of Vienna. 2022.
Mora-Gámez F, Morales Fontanilla J, Bernasconi O. Human Rights, Violence(s), and STS. 2022. 4S-ESOCITE Cholula, Cholula, Mexico.
Klimburg-Witjes N, Staus H. Space Debris: An underestimated danger? Wien: Trending Topics GmbH. 2022.
Mayer K. Soziotechnische Aspekte der KI-gestützten Ermittlungspraxis: Wissenschaftlicher Endbericht. 2022. 50 S.
Felt U. Welche Wissenschaft für welche Gesellschaft: Gedanken zur Zukunft der Wissenschaft. Picus Verlag, 2022.
Zeige Ergebnisse 81 - 100 von 566